FANDOM


Forums: Index > Dobbstalk > Proposed Secondary JoX the Bobtist


This discussion is considered archived. Please do not edit it. It will have no effect.

Because of continuing problems with vandalism and hostility, IPs and brand new members to subgenius.wikia.com cannot edit this page.

A decision on this issue will be made one week from posting, on 26 November 2015 when another editor expresses an opinion on this issue (this change is by request of the nominee JoX the Bobtist). This is not a vote but a request for consensus. See Forum:Who Decides.

I propose we elevate User:JoX the Bobtist to Secondary Editor/Secondary Voter by Forum:Who Decides.

The current two secondary editors have this:

Ivan Stang: named user, 100+ productive edits, active for one month+, familiar with the website's focus, added image(s) to article(s)

PatrickCunningham: named user, 100+ productive edits, active for one month+, created article(s), uploaded image(s) to site, added image(s) to article(s)

Compare to:

JoX the Bobtist: named user, 100+ productive edits, active for one month+, familiar with the website's focus, consistently worked to follow Wikia policy, created article(s), performed site maintenance, uploaded image(s) to site, added image(s) to article(s)

By badges, Ivan has 440, JoX has 260, and Mr. Cunningham 210. Nothing against Mr. Cunningham, but 100 of his were random because he happened to make the 6,000 edit on the website. I really believe JoX should be made a secondary editor. Miley Spears Junior Bobbie Girl (let's talk) 03:49, November 19, 2015 (UTC)

This is one reason I don't like going by badge totals. They can easily be misleading. Pope Hilde (talk) 17:20, November 19, 2015 (UTC)

CommentsEdit

  • COMMENT. I support the elevation for the reasons above. Miley Spears Junior Bobbie Girl (let's talk) 03:50, November 19, 2015 (UTC)
  • COMMENT. I would agree with this with one, possibly two, changes. I would strike established long-time SubGenius (1 year+). As it says in Forum:Who Decides, "Important: None of this is meant to be taken negatively. For example, if under a user you do not see "established long-time SubGenius", that does not mean that user is not a long-time SubGenius. It merely means that user hasn't demonstrated that on this website." You may well know JoX as a long-term SubGenius as may I, but JoX is not established to "the new Church" or by posts to this website under that name. And JoX may have "performed site maintenance" but can you show an example of that? Pope Hilde (talk) 17:18, November 19, 2015 (UTC)
  • COMMENT. In view of Miley's two posts immediately above, I accept the proposal to elevate JoX the Bobtist to Secondary Editor/Voter. Pope Hilde (talk) 13:43, November 21, 2015 (UTC)
  • COMMENT. This is all very nice and everything, but because I don't intend to vote here it's rather unnecessary. But I'll accept it as long as someone other than just Miley and Hilde support it. JoX the Bobtist (talk) 03:28, November 27, 2015 (UTC)
  • COMMENT. As it's now been 2 1/2 months with no objection, do as you will. But I still don't intend to vote. JoX the Bobtist (talk) 21:50, February 5, 2016 (UTC)

The decision was made by consensus to elevate JoX the Bobtist to Secondary Editor. Pope Hilde (talk) 22:10, February 25, 2016 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.